kinematics
Undoing Faked Apollo Studio Videos (kidding)
06/08/08 21:55 Filed in: Physics
(How to make your own fake moon videos - or
how to undo the fake studio videos)
Stop. Don’t say it. I know the moon landings were real, but I am just trying to have fun.
Some claim that the Apollo moon landings were faked in a studio. One way to make fake films would be to film astronauts and then slow the film down so it looks like they are on the moon. If this were the case, I could speed the videos back up to “normal” speed and see what they look like. After that, I will take normal videos and slow them down to make them look like they are on the moon.
Read More...
Stop. Don’t say it. I know the moon landings were real, but I am just trying to have fun.
Some claim that the Apollo moon landings were faked in a studio. One way to make fake films would be to film astronauts and then slow the film down so it looks like they are on the moon. If this were the case, I could speed the videos back up to “normal” speed and see what they look like. After that, I will take normal videos and slow them down to make them look like they are on the moon.
Read More...
Amazing Blob Jump Launch Video Analysis
30/07/08 16:22 Filed in: Physics
Can you believe it? Have you seen this video?
Are you thinking what I am thinking? WOW. How could these people not follow my rules for cool internet video. Once again, here they are:
Despite failure to follow all these rules, I have managed to analyze this video. Really when I saw it, I said “wow” - was that real? It looked real, but who would get shot up that high? (it is on break.com, so fake is a possibility).
Read More...
Are you thinking what I am thinking? WOW. How could these people not follow my rules for cool internet video. Once again, here they are:
- Keep the camera stationary. This way I don’t have to keep moving the origin in the movie.
- Don’t Zoom. Same reason, this video followed that rule.
- Include a clear and obvious calibration object. A meter stick would work, or even a Kobe Bryant (I can look up his height). Maybe it could be a Ford F-150 that has a known length. Something!
- Include the mass and height of all people involved.
- Use high quality video.
- Don’t talk about fight club - oh wait, wrong list.
Despite failure to follow all these rules, I have managed to analyze this video. Really when I saw it, I said “wow” - was that real? It looked real, but who would get shot up that high? (it is on break.com, so fake is a possibility).
Read More...
Acceleration due to gravity or Gravitational Field?
09/07/08 07:51 Filed in: Physics
You see this all the time in textbooks:
This is often described as “the acceleration due to gravity”. Is this really the best thing to call this? No. A better name would be “the local gravitational field” and list it in units of:
Read More...
This is often described as “the acceleration due to gravity”. Is this really the best thing to call this? No. A better name would be “the local gravitational field” and list it in units of:
Read More...
Kobe - Fake Jump or Real
23/06/08 08:26 Filed in: Physics
We have all seen the Kobe Bryant video of him jumping
over an Aston Martin - this keeps coming up on the
Internet. There has been vast discussions of whether
this is real or fake. I will do my best to examine
the evidence. In short (in case you don’t want to
read the whole thing) Kobe can most likely really
jump that high, it is possible that there was some
perspective trickery involved. Here is the video in
case you are brand new to the WWW:
Read More...
Read More...
Reality Verification of Kobe Bryant
25/05/08 21:35 Filed in: Physics
Ok, I am trying to be quick with this, since it is
current. Here is an awesome video of Kobe Bryant
jumping over a pool with snakes in it (I found this
on digg):
It looks so crazy, I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if this is feasible (well, I know it is not feasible for me). Let me just pull out one of my favorite tools - Tracker Video Analysis. Read More...
It looks so crazy, I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if this is feasible (well, I know it is not feasible for me). Let me just pull out one of my favorite tools - Tracker Video Analysis. Read More...
Physics Savvy Quiz
14/05/08 16:05 Filed in: Physics
General
Science
Here is a nice little (well not too short) quiz on
the basics of high school level physics (with no
math). Basically it is a true or false type quiz.
Take it for fun:
Physics Savvy Quiz
I missed a couple of the questions (well, technically I missed three).
One question was about negative acceleration. I really don't like this because I think of acceleration as a vector:
In which case "negative" acceleration does not really make sense. If you are talking about components of acceleration, then you can have a negative component. It is possible to have a negative component of acceleration in the same direction as the component of velocity, so that would make the speed increase. I guess I am just sensitive about vectors. (really I am just making an excuse for why I missed that one).
The other one I missed was comparing milliliters and cubic centimeters. I never see milliliters and accidentally read it as millimeters. You can't compare millimeters and cm3, so I chose false. That is wrong.
The last one I missed is completely my fault. It was asking about the mass of a cloud. Really, just a lack of knowledge on my part.
Anyway, check out the quiz. Lots of fun. Really, I am just stalling because I have not finished my next project and I don't want to leave my site unupdated (I know thats not really a word).
Physics Savvy Quiz
I missed a couple of the questions (well, technically I missed three).
One question was about negative acceleration. I really don't like this because I think of acceleration as a vector:
In which case "negative" acceleration does not really make sense. If you are talking about components of acceleration, then you can have a negative component. It is possible to have a negative component of acceleration in the same direction as the component of velocity, so that would make the speed increase. I guess I am just sensitive about vectors. (really I am just making an excuse for why I missed that one).
The other one I missed was comparing milliliters and cubic centimeters. I never see milliliters and accidentally read it as millimeters. You can't compare millimeters and cm3, so I chose false. That is wrong.
The last one I missed is completely my fault. It was asking about the mass of a cloud. Really, just a lack of knowledge on my part.
Anyway, check out the quiz. Lots of fun. Really, I am just stalling because I have not finished my next project and I don't want to leave my site unupdated (I know thats not really a word).
Scooting Update
08/05/08 08:03 Filed in: Physics
So, you knew I was
going to make some mistakes on the physics
of scooting - right? I don't think these
mistakes are major and they don't take away from
the main idea. Read
More...
The Physics of Scooting
04/05/08 21:00 Filed in: Physics
There you are, in your
rolling chair. You need that extra pencil, it is just
a few feet away but out of reach. For some reason,
you don't want to touch your feet to the floor. How
do you get that pencil? You scoot. Still don't get
it? Here is an example:
Why do people scoot? I don't know. My kids do it too. When does a human learn to scoot? How does a scoot work? Really, I am just going to answer that last question, but the others are interesting also. Read More...
Why do people scoot? I don't know. My kids do it too. When does a human learn to scoot? How does a scoot work? Really, I am just going to answer that last question, but the others are interesting also. Read More...
Mythbuster's Exploding Water Heater
17/04/08 21:18 Filed in: Physics
In case you never saw it, here is the part of the
episode where the Mythbusters explode a water heater.
I started to analyze this previously, but it wasn't complete. Now I will finish what I started.
If you are curious, here are the "answers":
Time of flight = 11.8 seconds.
Max height = 167 meters = 548 feet
Speed on impact (ground) = 34 m/s = 76 mph (compared to 234 mph initially). Read More...
I started to analyze this previously, but it wasn't complete. Now I will finish what I started.
If you are curious, here are the "answers":
Time of flight = 11.8 seconds.
Max height = 167 meters = 548 feet
Speed on impact (ground) = 34 m/s = 76 mph (compared to 234 mph initially). Read More...
Air Resistance of a falling tennis ball
07/04/08 21:25 Filed in: Physics
Suppose I want to have a lab activity with a dropping
tennis ball. Do I need to worry about air resistance
or can I assume there is none? This is a that was
recently asked of me. Below is my answer:
Read More...
Ford F-150 vs. Plane - Update
03/03/08 13:33 Filed in: Physics
Some time ago, I posted an analysis
of the Ford F-150 commercial where the truck
is shown to stop a landing C-123 Airplane.
Apparently, this was quite popular and I
received some useful and interesting feedback.
From this, I have a few updates. Read
More...
Newton's 2nd in a nutshell
13/02/08 21:39 Filed in: Physics
First, I am not really sure why Newton got to call
this HIS law. Second, its not really a law. What
happens if you don't obey this law? Would I go to
physics jail? Ok, now for the good stuff. I am going
to try to give a brief summary of Newton's 2nd law.
Read More...
Are you Aristotle or Newton - Play this game
01/02/08 21:17 Filed in: Physics
Aristotle: A constant force makes an
object move at a constant speed.
Newton: A constant force makes an object move at a constant acceleration (changing velocity)
Read
More...
Newton: A constant force makes an object move at a constant acceleration (changing velocity)
Read
More...
Ford - brings out the great commercials
15/01/08 13:47 Filed in: Physics
Ford, why are you the way you are? Do you actually
have people look at your commercials? Or do you just
assume that you can say and show whatever you want
and I will buy a truck? I am sorry, I shouldn't say
that. I do enjoy analyzing your commercials - so,
please continue.
Ford's latest F150 commercial shows a big thing dropping from a helicopter to the bed of an F150. The claim is that Ford is awesome. 30,000 lbs awesome. Let's check this out.
Read More...
Ford's latest F150 commercial shows a big thing dropping from a helicopter to the bed of an F150. The claim is that Ford is awesome. 30,000 lbs awesome. Let's check this out.
Read More...
The Physics of Line Rider
07/01/08 12:43 Filed in: Physics
Line Rider. Yes, its a game. Yes, I know its not real
life. Nonetheless, I analyze what I see. How is the
physics in line rider? Does it agree with Newtonian
mechanics? What is the scale of the line rider? What
other questions are there? What other questions are
there?
Read More...
Read More...
Ford F-150 vs. a Plane - really?
06/01/08 22:01 Filed in: Physics
I am sure you have seen this commercial:
They say its a real demonstration, but it has seemed odd to me. (they also say this is a professional driver on a closed course and don't try this at home - damn! I was SO going to do that this weekend). Here is my analysis: Read More...
They say its a real demonstration, but it has seemed odd to me. (they also say this is a professional driver on a closed course and don't try this at home - damn! I was SO going to do that this weekend). Here is my analysis: Read More...